Ilker Uckay
Balgrist University Hospital, SwitzerlandPresentation Title:
Is there a need to change perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during antibiotic therapy and iterative debridement for orthopedic infections?
Abstract
Objective: The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with a single-shot of 1st or 2nd- generation cephalosporins is evidence-based in elective orthopedic surgery regarding the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). There are, however, situations with a high risk of prophylaxis-resistant SSIs. We evaluate the rationale for a broad-spectrum prophylaxis in two specific patient populations with such a high risk: surgery in chronically open wounds and surgery under the influence of concomitant antibiotic therapy.
Methods: We perform a retrospective study in one Swiss University Hospital (Geneva), and a prospective (confirmatory) trial in another one (Zurich) investigating the epidemiology and prevention of secondary SSI (Surgical Site Infections) under Open wound, revision surgeries and/or systemic antibiotic treatments. Specifically, we run a clinical trial randomizing (1:1) eligible adult orthopedic patients into a “standard” (cefuroxime) vs. a broad-spectrum prophylaxis (single-shot of combined vancomycin 1 g & gentamicin 5 mg/kg). In case of concomitant antibiotic therapies, the “standard” prophylaxis either represents cefuroxime or the continuation of the therapeutic agent.
Results: In Geneva, among 2480 episodes of orthopedic infections, we detected pathogens in 507 cases (507/862; 59%), of which 241 (242/507; 48%) were the same species found at the index debridement. In terms of new pathogens, there were 265 new SSIs (11% of the cohort) and in 174 cases (7% of cohort) these organisms were resistant to current antibiotic therapy. In Zurich, a total of 193 episodes received the “standard” prophylaxis and 147 the vancomycin-gentamicin combination. Among infected cases that were iteratively debrided, the proportion of secondary SSIs with new intraoperative pathogens was 17% in the standard vs. 10% in the broad-spectrum arm (χ2-test; p=0.03). As a consequence, the clinicians broadened the therapeutic antibiotic regimen in 17% of episodes with prior standard prophylaxis vs. 7% with previously broad prophylaxis (p=0.01). The association with immediate "clinical failures” in the aftermath of surgery was less in the broad-spectrum arm (71 failures / 193 standard prophylaxes vs. 44 failures / 147 broad-spectrum prophylaxis; p=0.18). When considering late failures, the corresponding proportions were 17% and 14%, respectively (p=0.91). The risk of Severe Adverse Events (SAE) during and after hospitalization was similar (41 in the standard vs. 35 in the broad-spectrum arm; p=0.57).
Conclusions: We saw a tendency to a better general SSI prevention in favor of the broad-spectrum prophylaxis, compared to the standard "protocol"; albeit not significantly. The benefit of the broad-spectrum prophylaxis seems higher for the prevention of future broader-spectrum antibiotic treatments.
Biography
Ilker Uçkay is a physician who graduated from the University of Zürich, Faculty of Medicine. He began his career in Infectious Diseases at Geneva University Hospitals in October 2002. Besides daily consultations in almost all fields of Infectious Diseases and regular work in Infection Prevention, Since July 2018, he is the Head of Clinical Research in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Balgrist University Hospital; the Head of Infectiology and Infection Control; and recently a fellow of the Royal College of Physicians.